<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Posts on Suzumi's little web corner</title><link>https://suzumi-nagata.github.io/posts/</link><description>Recent content in Posts on Suzumi's little web corner</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 23:29:08 -0300</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://suzumi-nagata.github.io/posts/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>ECDSA: Visually Explained</title><link>https://suzumi-nagata.github.io/posts/20260221153517-ecdsa_visually_explained/</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 00:00:00 -0300</pubDate><guid>https://suzumi-nagata.github.io/posts/20260221153517-ecdsa_visually_explained/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="introduction"&gt;Introduction&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, a few days ago a colleague at work said he has been studying
Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) and went to ask me if his
understanding of the ECDSA &lt;a href="#citeproc_bib_item_1"&gt;[1]&lt;/a&gt; was
correct. Getting caught by surprise I &lt;del&gt;(first had to refresh my
memory 😅 as its been a while since the last time I actually looked
at the algorithm inner workings, then I)&lt;/del&gt; tried to explain the
algorithm verbally with some improvised drawings. He seemed to
understand that his previous idea of the algorithm was &lt;em&gt;almost&lt;/em&gt;
right, but not quite there, however, I think I may have left him
more confused than before.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>